I read a couple of books about a girl who was, Mennonite I think? and living in the 16 or 1700’s. She worked in a printing factory and married a guy who worked I forget where. It was during the plague that hit Europe. Also there was a lot of government pressure trying to force them to not meet as a religious group anymore.
Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry was a really good book, but not it.

---

That is a grrreat question I have no ideas sorry
But it sounds like a good book
Hayzzz | Sep 01, 2009

---

The book is called Roll of Thunder, Hear my Cry by Mildred D. Taylor
Jacquie | Sep 01, 2009

I have seen the ghost ship but i can’t get on it. I don’t have the ghost chart. If i need that then could you tell me what square it is in and what to do in that square.

---

Well you need the ghost chart first. Here’s how you do it:
First go to Diamond Steppe Island. I think it’s 6A but I know it’s the box above the very bottom left one. To get on Diamond Steppe Island stay in your boat near a tree and then use to Hookshot to grab onto to it. Keep doing this to climb the levels until you find a hole. Go in the hole and then there will be a puzzle. Here’s a picture of the puzzle.. Just follow the instructions on the image.

 http://db.gamefaqs.com/console/gamecube/ file/zelda_wind_waker_ghost_chart_soluti on.gif
 http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/0/0e/Dia mondSteppeIsland.jpg

It’s pretty easy. And once you get the chart go to where your Sea Chart starts flashing a blue ship. Sail into the ghost ship and just beat the enemies.

Cybs | Apr 03, 2008

---

You’ll need the ghost ship chart, as you can only board the ship during certain phases of the moon. Go to Diamond Steppe Island to get the chart. It will show you where the Ghost Ship is during each moon phase.
HilPoof | Apr 04, 2008

I was answering someone’s question, and that question suddenly popped in my head. It’s very interesting…click the link below

What do you guys think? At the moment, besides two states, psychologists cannot prescribe medication.

 http://www.wjla.com/headlines/0405/22178 9.html

I have many reasons to think "yes" but I don’t want that to affect the responses to this question.
I feel like most people are not reading the link. The link says that these medical psychologists will need ADDITIONAL training. That means that they will learn about neurotransmitters and other topics related to prescription medicine.

---

No, because they do have the right for recommendations for treatment but do not have the same training nor knowledge of the body (not brain, psych issues) but physical pharmacokinetics. Consider that most psych drugs can effect heart rhythms and folks with certain health conditions and based on lab values for organ function. It’s a medical realm thing, yes psychologists do wonderful meaningful work but didn’t go through med school or advanced practice nursing so would they be able to address the issues that may arise from physical side effects and have the training and knowledge what to look for? What if the lack of medical training knowlege lead to deaths it’s very likely. Not to knock the profession at all they have a very demanding and skilled field but there is a difference in modulatities and focus. Presciption medicine can have wonderful effects on behavior and individuals functions, they can also kill and harm. Even with a specialized medical program that steps into the medical realm the dangers are present do they run regular EKG’s and lab work-ups can they read and interpet them properly? With the massive problems our country has for mental health care 2 states may try this the rest of us with higher populations can watch but a non biased study of patient outcomes needs to be done, patient or client safety comes first.

coffeegirl | Aug 20, 2006

---

yes certain medication such as depressents i dont see why not….
Cheyenne | Aug 20, 2006

---

i think they should. after all, they pretty much do the same things a psychiatrist does.
miami*87 | Aug 20, 2006

---

Don’t know about America but in Europe some Psychologists can prescribe medication to their patents. For example anti depressants tablets
Countessa06 | Aug 20, 2006

---

No, they are holding a Ph.d. in a unproven science. They’re job is to find other methods, and compile information to prove the science. If you want to perscribe medicine become a Psychiatrist and get an LPC.
Icarus | Aug 20, 2006

---

It is great that psychologists cannot prescribe medicine. The sole difference between a psychologist and a psychiatrist is a psychiatrist has a medical degree, so they better understand the full effects (and side effects) of a given medicine, and can better diagnose and treat patients with medicine. Giving anyone without a medical degree the ability to prescribe medicine is a crime!
gaybobbarker | Aug 20, 2006

---

yes if they have there doctors degree in phsychology
Ash | Aug 20, 2006

---

Heck no. Psychotherapy is far more effective at bringing about a CURE than any drug. Psychiatrists and MDs are always pushing drugs on people that rarely, if ever, effect a cure. Curing is done through a dynamic process that takes place between the brain and the body. Besides, psychologists don’t have the pharmaceutical training that MDs and psychiatrists have.

Icarus desperately needs to do his homework.

‘Nuff said?
'nuff said? | Aug 20, 2006

---

They are not physicians. They did not attend medical school. They are not qualified to understand the side affects and interactions of prescription medication. If they want to prescribe drugs…go to medical school and specialize in Psychiatry.
GOSHAWK | Aug 20, 2006

---

if they qualify by a course in pharmacology yes for meds for mental health problems only
 nora7142 at verizon.net | Aug 20, 2006

---

Sure they should be able to…if they attend medical school.
PsyDocMD | Aug 20, 2006

---

Two things:
-Having been around clinical psych phd students (I did mine as a neuroscientist), I’d be FRIGHTENED to have them prescribe any drug. They are not prepared for it, most of them don’t have that type of scientific mentality, and some are in there because of their own psych problems.
-The training they have and would receive is insufficient. You need years to understand the effect of drugs and their effect on other drugs. IF they wanted to be pill pushers, they should have done their medical school and become shrinks
-(ok, I said two but I just thought of this one). Drugs are already overprescribed and too easy to access, don’t give medical drug addicts another medium.
sabbat | Aug 20, 2006

---

NO because they do not have the medical experience to address drug interactions, allergies, adverse reactions, toxicity….
Maybe if their perscriptions are limited to a narrow classification of medications similar to what which is allowable by nurse practioners or physician’s assistants where they are very limited it what they can perscribe and they are under the supervison or have close contact with a medical doctor.
mochi.girl | Aug 21, 2006

There is a twitter account with 50,000 followers,
and I want a list of that accounts’ followers.

can I receive that List in any way?

Thanks.

---

You can find lots of answers about Twitter in here:

 http://ttter.com

The page is full of resources about Twitter. I hope it helps.
Michelle van Daren | Oct 27, 2009

---

Hi Ronen,

Yes there are few softwares that would do it for you but not too accurate. Try Scriptlance or Elance.

Someone will do it for 10-20 bucks and it will be more accurate.
Sonny | Oct 29, 2009

Your team trailed the series 2W 3L. You decided to use all your starters but save one for possible game 7. After 9 innings, your team made a good come back and tie the scores. The game goes on for 5 extra innings (make it a 14 inning game) and it’s still a tie game. Therefore, you have pretty much used all your pitchers. The only two left are (1)the rookie pitcher with 1W4L, 9.25 era ; And (2) the Game 7 starter.
Who will you send to the mound? If you choose the game 7 starter, how are you gonna arrange your game 7 pitching?

---

if you have no faith in the rookie go with game 7 starter. you have to win this game to stay alive. if you lose what good did it do to save the starter. in game 7 every pitcher should be available regardless of rest time, after all it will be the last game of the season and they can all rest during the offseason

tano494 | Mar 19, 2007

---

first off I would not use all starters this is why there are 10-11 pithcers on a 25 man roster. I would wonder if the pitcher pitched for the black sox.

FIRE SELIG NOW!
zyberianwarrior | Mar 19, 2007

---

Using your starter has NOW become your best odds.otherwise, the situation you’ve created require you’re starter to pitch a complete game 7 (unlikely) or use you worn out bullpen on 1 days rest
H.E. G | Mar 19, 2007

---

dumb ?
qman39_1 | Mar 19, 2007

---

You go with the Game 7 starter …you can use the rookie in game seven and use all your starting pitchers again…using the ones that pitched the least…

But if it was me i would actually use the rookie cuz i am not it in for the fame and glory…and who knows he might pitch really well…
tim k | Mar 19, 2007

---

You can’t win Game 7 if you don’t win Game 6. Pitch your best pitcher available and worry about tomorrow after today passes.
matuszak24 | Mar 19, 2007

25.10.09

Can’t keep up with the Jones’s on Twitter? Now you can use Bing or Google to track down the latest tweets of whatever fascination the web is pulsing at break-neck speed.

 

In the continuing obsession to make everything real-time on the web, meaning that search engines return results from things that have happened within the past few minutes rather than the past few days, Bing and Google are adding Twitter to its growing list of items to track.

 

So maybe the larger question to ask is … are we approaching a Twitter bubble? How much can the web obssess over a basic service that really is not used effectively in 99% of its tweets? Breaking news aside, how much good information do you get on Twitter compared to a lot of stuff that you don’t even (need to) remember a week later?

 http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/arti cle/ALeqM5j0UZABjgotaBUAWLNF4NLIPKExCAD9 BJGDF00

---

no
— source: NASCAR section Top Contributor
Cigar that Bill Clinton Sniffs | Oct 27, 2009

---

suspension is too much….dang people lighten up.
wonderlich | Oct 27, 2009

OK SO I KNOW THERE ARE TWO ADDAMS FAMILY MOVIES OTHER THEN THE THE TWO ARE THERE ANY MORE OUT THERE BESIDES THE SIERIES???
I HAVE THE ADDAMS FAMILY AND THE ADDAMS FAMILY VALUES…..

---

yeah theirs a third one
but its crap
and has like none of the original actors in!!

xo

Srhkt!! xo | Dec 29, 2008

---

nope sorry
Beans | Dec 29, 2008

---

there was the tv show but there isn’t any more movies because the father died in real life so they didn’t make any more. good thing though because if they replaced him it would be bad.
narnia_kid | Dec 29, 2008

---

yes. there is a third one and wednesday goes to camp. none of the original actors. the movies sucks though. dont waste your time
fldhkygrl09 | Dec 29, 2008

---

In the 1993 film Addams Family Values, Gomez and Morticia have a third child, a son named Pubert (voiced by Cheryl Chase), a mustachioed baby who seems to escape certain death through random chance a number of times. At some points in the movie flaming arrows that originate off-screen fly, with the implication that Pubert is the one who shot them. Originally conceived by Charles Addams for the character eventually named Pugsley in the ’60s TV series, the name was rejected due to fears that network censors would disallow it.

Pubert is referred to in the unrelated 1998 straight-to-video film Addams Family Reunion and the short-lived follow-up series that aired on Fox Family Channel, in which Wednesday states that there used to be a third sibling, but that they ate it.
and
A third film, 1998’s Addams Family Reunion, was released direct-to-video, this time by Warner Bros. through its video division. It has no relation to the Paramount movies, being in fact a full-length pilot for a second live-action television version, The New Addams Family, produced and shot in Canada. The third movie’s Gomez, played by Tim Curry, follows the style of Raul Julia, while the new sitcom’s Gomez, played by Glenn Taranto, is played in the style of John Astin, who had played the character in the 1960s. The only actors in this Warner Brother’s production to have played in the previous Paramount films were Carel Struycken as Lurch and Christopher Hart as Thing.

The New Addams Family was filmed in Vancouver, Canada, and ran for 65 episodes during the 1998